“GlaxoSmithKline spent almost $100 million promoting social anxiety disorder in what they called a public
awareness campaign just two or three months after they
got FDA approval for Paxil — then, the only pharmaceutical treatment available,” Lane explains. “Meanwhile, the
psychiatric community went straight for medication and
largely overlooked other forms of viable treatment.”
While medication can provide immediate relief from
anxiety (although at the risk of side effects), long-term
pharmaceutical treatment rests on the controversial
1950s-era theory that mental illness is caused by a “
chemical imbalance” that can be corrected with medications.
When the brain functions normally, it sends what can
be thought of as a chemical code from one cell to the
next using substances called neurotransmitters. When a
person is depressed or anxious, levels of some of these
neurotransmitters drop; thus, the notion that correcting
the chemical balance corrects the condition.
Although the metaphor of an imbalanced brain persists, we now know that it’s a biological oversimplification. Neurotransmitters like serotonin and dopamine may
be present in higher or lower levels during various emotional states — but that doesn’t necessarily mean they are
the primary cause of those states. In fact, they can just
as easily be seen as the result or biochemical product of
emotional experiences.
Moreover, depression and anxiety are normal, predictable responses to certain life events, so any change in brain
chemistry during these states can’t accurately or always be
described as an “imbalance.” Neurotransmitters often play
more than just one role in the brain and can act broadly
to influence all sorts of body functions (serotonin, for
example, has been shown to play a role in both mood and
appetite), so interfering with their transmission can affect
more than just mood — sometimes in unpredictable ways.
Drug interactions with brain chemistry are similarly
broad: Any drug, whether cocaine or Prozac, affects our
mental state by broadly repressing or enhancing our ability to manufacture, release or transfer certain neurotransmitters. Which is to say that increasing or suppressing the
transmission of a selected neurotransmitter increases or
suppresses all the roles that neurotransmitter plays in the
brain, not just its one role in, say,
anxiety. (For a look at how nutrition
affects neurotransmitters and moods,
see “Comfort Food for Your Brain,”
page 62.)
But perhaps the most damaging
aspect of the chemical imbalance
theory is that it treats the brain in
isolation from the rest of the body.
In fact, they’re one highly integrated system.
Research has shown that our mental and emotional
states are a complicated mix of brain chemistry and biology,
as well as genetic, environmental and physical factors.
Instead of thinking of the brain as some kind of isolated
chemical lab that sends directions to the body, scientists now
understand that our bodily experiences and our environments
directly affect the functioning of the brain. Increasingly,
doctors are recognizing this connection as an essential
element in effectively treating disorders like anxiety.
Instead of thinking of the brain as some
kind of isolated chemical lab that sends directions
to the body, scientists now understand that our
bodily experiences and our environments directly
affect the functioning of the brain.
MIND-BODY CONNECTIONS
The biological processes triggered by anxiety — sweaty
hands, shallow breathing, increased heart rate, dizziness
— are hardwired human responses to stressful situations.
Most of these responses serve some biological purpose,
such as preparing our bodies to react (fight or flee), or
they are the byproduct of the chemicals, such as cortisol
and adrenaline, that such a reaction might require. It’s
when we perceive a major threat in situations where,
objectively speaking, there is little or none — for example, in a crowded elevator (claustrophobia), crossing a
bridge (fear of heights), leaving the house (agoraphobia)
or at an office mixer (social anxiety) — that anxiety is
classified as a disorder.
The more frequently or dramatically an unwarranted
response occurs, and the more it interferes with a ➺